Questionable Questions
Big surprise: G. O. P. Opens Intense Attack on the Choice and the Chooser (NY Times).
It's a little disconcerting that the Bush-Cheney Campaign shows how quick on its feet it can be, with a plethora of information ready to publish to one of it's many secured domains (KerryPicksEdwards.com, KerryPicksGephardt.com, KerryPicksVilsack.com, KerryPicksClark.com, KerryPicksBiden.com all now lead to a GOP "fact" sheet on Edwards [via Wonkette]) in an attempt to tear down an opponent when they can't even get their facts straight regarding the war on terror or the war in Iraq. Hey, guys, how about worrying about your own problems before Edwards'?
Their main arguments seem to be that:
1. Neither Edwards, nor Kerry for that matter, are "ready" to be President, which is funny since we don't even currently seem to have a President that's ready to be President. Yes, Bush was Governor of Texas for six years and being chief executive of a state is usually considered good training for a potential chief executive of the nation, but Edwards has been in the Senate for six years and probably has a greater understanding of foreign relations than Bush had when he moved to Washington.
2. Edwards is Kerry's second choice (after John McCain, which always seemed like more of a media wet dream than an actual possibility), which is funny because the president we currently have was a majority of voters' second choice in an election in which so many citizens were so unenthusiastic about either choice that they made no choice at all. Not to mention the fact that Cheney may very well have been Bush's second choice in 2000 (after John McCain supposedly declined, unwilling to be number two to the guy who basically called him a nut in the primaries). And to go even further back, wasn't George H.W. Bush Reagan's second choice after Gerald Ford declined the offer in 1980?
